02.14.10

Chemicals, Humans and Daily Living

Posted in Chemicals, Environment, Glad Ware Company, Green Companies, Green Household Products, Green Living, Recycling, Technology, pollution at 4:59 am by Administrator

The last blog post examined some ways that chemicals and particularly those in plastics harm animal life, both on land and in the sea. This post will examine how certain chemicals harm humans. During my reading on this subject in the last week or so, one thing became very clear to me. Human and animal health is directly linked to the health of the environment. That seems like such an obvious statement, but oftentimes humans would like to think of environmental problems as just nature or animal problems. But when chemicals are involved, what affects animals also many times directly or indirectly affects the health of humans as well.

I read several articles on the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch” which went into more detail about how the effects of tons of garbage in the Pacific Ocean is poisoning or killing the wildlife. The really sad thing is that there seems to be no quick feasible way to clean it up because it involves several countries, is very far from land and just gets complicated. This will take a lot of concentrated effort on everyone’s part including governments, advocacy groups, scientists and engineers to name a few, not to mention the money involved. But the chemicals leaking into the ocean from this garbage eventually makes its way into some of the fish/seafood we eat which makes its way into our bodies.  Some pregnant women have been warned in the past not to eat certain fish because of the levels of certain chemicals. The ole food chain quandary sometimes gets really complicated. You’ll find several articles on this subject on http://www.treehugger.com and http://planetgreen.discovey.com.  One program in particular that is taking a proactive stance in research and is taking positive actions to help clean up and prevent future ocean littering is Project Kaisei. Read about their good work at http://www.projectKaisei.org. Their work gives me hope that there is a solution. They are researching how to use this garbage to recycle into fuel of some kind. Through them we all can help with the research and clean up by helping fund the effort.

The websites noted above present much information about the chemicals that make their way into our bodies, not just through the ocean garbage dump but in our own homes, in every day living. Over this last decade, discussions, research and concerns have continued to rise about the harmful affects of certain plastics, or the chemical compounds making up certain plastics. These are the ones we are in contact with the most and which this blog will concentrate.

Questions began to arise about the chemical compounds of some plastics back in the 1980’s and continued into the new decade and century. Finally, recently after many studies, disagreements between agencies, researchers, scientists, industry personnel, advocacy groups, and others that had invested interest on one side or the other, the FDA made an announcement which denounced their previous finding earlier in the decade about bisphenol A (BPA). The FDA agency does now find ‘reason for concern’ about bisphenol A. However, the FDA took no further action. The statement itself was good and encouraging that more research will take place. But even so, bisphenol A or BPA is still in hundreds of products we use in everyday life.

That’s not to say that all plastics are harmful. Some plastics are safe and certainly useful. From my reading, one type of plastic used in many products proves to be non toxic in our daily use of it. It is named polypropylene. It is one of the few plastics that have no harmful occupational or health hazards during the manufacturing process as well (which is rare). Since the packaging of plastic products are not required to name the type of chemical compounds used in the product, how can we know what products we buy are made of this safe plastic? You will not know in the store. But you can either take down the phone number or website and contact the company and ask. Or you can buy the product and call before you unwrap or use the product to find out what it is made of, which is what I did last week. My bowls and tops had gotten so misplaced, borrowed or whatever that I needed to replace them so that I could send my husband to work with lunch that had a sealed top and could be warmed in the microwave. Having read that heating plastics is suspected to be one of the ways that BPA is leaked into our food and bodies, I called before I used. I purchased Glad Ware Containers with their “most interlocking lids ever.” The package said they were microwave, dishwasher and freezer safe. When I called, the Glad representative stated the lids were made from polypropylene and the containers were made from Terephthalate which is another plastic compound that meets the FDA regulations for food containers and storage.  (Regulations. U.S. FDA (1998) approved the use of PET as components of polyethylene phthalate polymers intended for use in contact with food in accordance with the conditions prescribed in 21 CFR part 177.1630.)  Glad has on its website a declaration of safety and non use of BPA in their products including sandwich bags, plastic wraps, trash bags as well as the food containers.

After reading some of the literature regarding concerns about the leakage of potentially harmful plastic compounds the most widely known one, bisphenol A, there is still reason for everyone to be concerned until it is proven without a doubt non-harmful to animals and humans.

BPA is used in all kinds of everyday products including CD’s, baby bottles, sippy cups, lining in cans containing canned foods, water bottles, medical supplies, literally thousands of products we use everyday. Researchers at the CDC found that BPA was found in 93% of urine samples taken in a study of over 2500 participants. The levels varied somewhat with men showing 2.6 micrograms per liter, women with 2.9 and children between ages six to eleven showing a measurement of 4.5. The debate is ongoing that BPA does or does not accumulate in our bodies. The people that think BPA is not harmful say that the chemical leaves the body through the urine, therefore it doesn’t cause problems. The questions remain: does all the BPA leave the body or does it accumulate somewhere in the body? If so where and what are the lingering affects? Researchers have stated that BPA in low amounts have been harmful to lab animals and assume the same is so with humans.

Other researchers have found through tests with animals that BPA is suspicious or related to heart disease, complications in breast and prostrate cancer treatments, fertility problems and others. The FDA seems to be specifically concerned about how BPA affects infants and young children. Canada has taken the step to ban and remove BPA from baby bottles. Many manufacturers and retailers in the USA have voluntarily taken products off the shelves that contain BPA.

So while the jury is still out and the research still underway on BPA and other harmful plastic compounds, what do we do in every day life to care for our children and ourselves? Below is a list that can get us thinking and started. I will be doing  these from now own, wish I’d known about such things when my children were young.

1. When in doubt, don’t use it. If you have a non plastic alternative, use it.

2. Contact the company and get their take on their products, then check the reputation of the company regarding violations of regulations, etc. The internet is a wonderful tool for this.

3. Use as little plastic as possible. Prevention on the front end is always better. Even if it is safe regarding human use, the disposal and recycling efforts of some plastics are not finely tuned. Much ends up in landfills (some say up to 22% or more of landfills are plastics) for millions of years to come – or in our oceans to cause havoc on the wildlife there and eventually making it back to our dinner table. Tons of other plastics just get thrown on roadways, parks, etc. where it stays forever until a good hearted human comes along and cleans it up. At least if it is an aluminum drink can littered in the park, it can be retrieved and easily recycled.

4. Advocate for better labeling of non-food products so we know what we are buying before we buy it.

5. Be on the safe side and buy glass baby bottles. Triple check the type of plastics in your childrens toys, especially teethers, rattles, etc. that will for sure go into their little mouths. Some harmful plastic are even in some childrens books that are bound in plastic. If you don’t know or can’t find out about safety, don’t buy it.

6. Aside from helping yourself and your family, get more involved. Some suggestions:

a. Celebrate Earth Day April 22.

b. Celebrate World Environmental Day June 5,

c. Celebrate World Ocean Day June 8.

d. Adopt a Mile clean up on a road near you.

e. Adopt a Stream, Creek, Lake, River, Bay, Ocean – any body of water will most likely have a clean up program. If not, get your community involved and start one.

d. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Reclaim energy.

e. Save energy and water.

f. Live as green as you can, garden, alternative energy, hybrid vehicles, etc.

g. Give, aside from giving of yourself, give money to valuable and needed earth friendly causes.

h. Teach your children and grandchildren the importance of taking care of the earth. Teach them about animals, nature and recycling to start.

i.  Pick at least one of these to do, preferably more.

j.  Inform others of risks and needs regarding our earth.

k.  Enjoy Your Earth!

01.24.10

Chemicals; the Good, the Bad, and the Harmful

Posted in Chemicals, Environment, Green Household Products, Green Living, pollution at 8:56 pm by Administrator

In the early 1900’s scientists from different backgrounds, labs and companies were experimenting on their various products. One would pick up on the compounds of another and add or take away a chemical or two and by the 1950’s the fantastic product that we know today as plastics had evolved and was on earth to stay. Plastic material was soon found in every type of industry around the globe.

Plastics in one form or another during its evolution have been and are still good for human use regarding the quality and comforts of life that it offers. I would not want medical professionals to still be sterilizing needles or washing syringes to give me a shot or to be examined by a dentist or doctor without gloves. I want new single use sterilized needles and new gloves. There is too much room for error and too many new germs out there. Imagine taking medicine in a hospital setting without those little plastics disposable cups filled with clean water. What would we do without food storage and freezer bags, plastic wrap for covering cooked foods, individualized wrapped foods for protection and freshness on the store shelf? Imagine how much cleaner our garbage disposal systems and communities are due to using those large plastic garbage bags to dispose of household garbage. How many diseases have decreased because of better sanitation methods due to plastics? I doubt anyone will ever be able to determine a statistic measuring the good that plastics brought into our world. We can only relate somewhat to the great impact that plastics have made. Another thing that would be impossible to do is to list all the types of products made from plastics. The number of items is just immeasurable. No doubt about it, plastics have impacted each of our lives in many positive ways. Plastic is not the enemy in this discussion, but one of the most common products we use that unfortunately is frequently made of some questionable chemical compounds.

As my recycling efforts continue, I have been surprised to find that I recycle more plastics than anything else. I thought as I began recycling that cans would be the most recycled item or maybe paper. I also have been noticing how much plastic and other trash, usually food and drink containers, is left on the side of the road, in parks, parking lots, around and in lakes, oceans, just about everywhere. This fact brought about the question how does the chemicals in plastics affect humans and how does it affect wildlife as they run into it in their habitats?

The answer regarding potential harm to humans has become the subject of many research studies and some will be summarized in the next blog. The harm for animals takes several forms and any type of plastic is potentially dangerous to animals. Sadly, harm to animals could be prevented if humans would only properly dispose of plastics and other trash. The majority of plastic related mishaps with animals involve the animal getting its neck legs, wing, head or other body part caught some way with plastic items and cannot get free. Many animals die because their entanglement remains if a human doesn’t come along to help. For example our golden retriever recently had a bottle cap wedged in his gum. It was in the back of his mouth and by the time it was obvious to us that he needed a vet’s care, the cap was imbedded in the gum with a serious infection and had to be cut out. We had no idea it was even there. Another way animals get into trouble regarding plastics is by ingesting some plastic object or bit of plastic that may end up choking them or harming their digestive system. All animals are susceptible. A quote from Wildlife Stewardship on the website http://www.centerforwildlifeinformation.org emphasizes this, “Animals will eat anything with an odor including aluminum foil, plastic and other food wrapping. These can severely damage an animal’s digestive system and may even facilitate death.”

Examples of animals coming into harms way due to human neglect is birds and marine animals getting caught in fishing line or nets that became hung up and left in trees or caught on something under the water. At http://www.News.NationalGeographic.com, it is stated that 44% of all seabirds eat plastic by accident. I’m sure many other wild birds do the same. Little bits of Styrofoam after all to a wild bird will look like a seed. This site also claims that 267 marine species are affected by plastics that are left in lakes and the oceans. It also stated that larger fish will swallow a grocery bag whole as it looks like a jellyfish.

Another way of potential harm to animals is by how the chemicals within the plastic harm the soil or environment around them. The article, Plastic Breaks Down in Oceans After All–And Fast, on the National Geographic website listed above shares information about this new discovery. It states that unlike what was once believed, plastics do not last for years in the ocean, but the chemicals in plastics begin breaking down within months. The chemical that is harmful once the plastic breaks down is styrene trimer, a polystyrene (plastic) by-product (suspected to be a carcinogen) and bisphenol A (interferes with reproductive systems in lab animals) which is found in hard plastics like water bottles, baby bottles, linings of aluminum cans and other containers. The article described our oceans as “Plastic Soup”, a toxic soup at that.

The oceans are not the only place where environmental hazards exist for animals and humans. Toxic wastes dumped wherever always has the potential to be harmful sooner or later, according to how it was disposed. Also gases and toxic fumes are still polluting our air. While these problems are a major concern and government agencies, researchers and scientists work hard every day to rectify what they can, chemicals remain one of the most serious pollutants. Plastic items just happen to be one if not the most common commodity made from some of these potentially harmful chemical compounds. But most people could not imagine living without at least some plastic items and I’m one of them.

Almost everything has a positive and negative side, chemicals certainly do as well. While chemicals are necessary for many of the comforts of life we enjoy, they also present problems for the environment. Let’s just face it; there will continue to be an ongoing task for society to clean up the environment. We’ve just got to keep at it. All these thoughts bring about the question; is there another cleaner and greener alternative perhaps commodity items made of chemicals that are good, not bad, not harmful, maybe?

10.27.09

Proctor and Gamble and Sustainability

Posted in Green Companies, Green Household Products, Green Living, Proctor and Gamble, Recycling at 7:41 pm by Administrator

Since my last post, I continued to take inventory of the products I use in my home and have been researching the companies that produce them. My goal is to see if these companies take into consideration sustainability and earth friendly products.

Most of what I use for house cleaning products, as I noted in the last post, were products made by S.C. Johnson Company. The research I did on them ‘passed’ my test of appropriate product research and development and their concern about decreasing their carbon footprint.

Most of the other products I use are produced by Proctor and Gamble Company. These products include: Tide (or Cheer or Gain) and Bounce for laundry; Cascade and Dawn for dish washing. For hygiene products almost all of them were produced by Proctor and Gamble. These include: Scope, Crest, Oral-B, Old Spice products, Secret, Head and Shoulders, Pepto-Bismol and Vicks products, Ivory and Zest soaps, Olay and Cover Girl products, Febreze and Charmin.

What it pretty much boils down to is that for my household, these two companies produce the majority of the products we use. So it has become more important to me that I know these two companies in particular care about the world.

As with S.C. Johnson company, during my research on Proctor and Gamble, I found some very interesting results. First of all, they have a Sustainability Strategy that contains five areas. These include: Products, Operations, Social Responsibility, Employees, and Stakeholders. Their web site has details about each area. I was impressed that not only have the products and operations areas made good progress, but their Social Responsibility area goes far beyond what I ever expected.

The company gears the Social Responsibility part of their strategy toward helping children in need of the basics like clean water, immunizations, health care, etc. These children are in countries that are in dire need of such help. In the last five years, the company has helped 87,000 children. Given that the welfare of children is high on my list, this one area really impressed me. Needless, to say they ‘passed’ my test as well.

Another fact that I didn’t know and probably most ordinary people in the U.S.A. didn’t either, is that Proctor and Gamble was added to the list of the Top 100 Global Sustainable Corporations in 2009. We’re talking global businesses! That’s a great honor. Please go and read more about Proctor and Gamble for yourself at http://www.pg.com.

As for me, I have started reducing, reusing, recycling, and researching companies where I buy my products. I am satisfied with both companies where most of my household and hygiene products are researched and produced. I was pleasantly satisfied that they are already into sustainability with products I use and that I do not need to change any products at this point.

I suppose now I maintain where I am with my recycling effort, but not consider it completed. There are two things I know I need to continue monitoring. One is the temptation to return to old life patterns. (Honestly, it is easier just to throw it in the trash.) The second thing is to research new companies when I consider a new product purchase.

But for S.C. Johnson and Proctor and Gamble, I say, “Keep up the good work for the green earth!” Also, thank you for your efforts in making our earth a better place to live.

10.25.09

Green Products for the Green Earth

Posted in Green Companies, Green Household Products, Green Living, Recycling, S.C.Johnson at 4:57 am by Administrator

I have been taking inventory of the products that I use most often in my home. The reason is that I wanted to find the ones that are earth friendly and to determine the ones that are not. I want to support the companies of the products that are into sustainability.

Some of the products I use regularly include Scrubbing Bubbles, Oust, Shout, Windex, Off, Pledge, Raid and Drano. For wrapping foods I use Ziploc bags and Saran Wrap. As it turns out all these products are made by S. C. Johnson. I researched the S.C. Johnson Company to find out if they were into sustainability. I am glad to say that S.C. Johnson is big time into green living and research continues on their products to improve them to be as sustainable as possible.

Their website www.scjohnson.com covers everything from CEO reports, to reports on chemicals in products, to what we can do in our homes to help be more green thinking and living. I especially liked this part of their website. The suggestions given on the site of things we can do at home included ideas for every room in the house. Some are common and well known like turn the water off while brushing your teeth. But did you know that when the stove top burner pans become caked with burned on grease or other food over time that they absorb more energy and therefore costs more to use? Did you know that when we use a six inch pan on an eight inch stove top burner, we waste over 40% of the energy produced by the burner? We need to match the pan we use to the burner size so as not to waste the energy. There are many other helpful ideas on the “Doing Your Part,” in the ‘Around the Home’ section of the website. It is worth reading for the living green cause, and it also may just save on utility bills.

I encourage you to take a good look at the S.C. Johnson website. There is loads more information on products and even coupons. I was really impressed that the company that produces so many of the items I use every day has been into sustainability for years, longer than I have. The Company has received two Presidential Recognition Awards for their “greenlist” process and their overall efforts towards sustainability.

Thanks S.C. Johnson for the great work and concern for our good Earth.

  • c span 2009
  • coefficient
  • freida pinto miral
  • chicago bears 61
  • branson
  • chicago bears 08 record
  • search operatorssearch people
  • darts
  • gainesville
  • prizm
  • greg olsen vikingsgreg olsen wife
  • chad ochocinco vs skip bayless
  • battleship wilmington nc
  • stones
  • scented
  • zara phillips tongue
  • new england patriots offense
  • bea 0b0 105
  • new england patriots 07
  • new england patriots gillette stadium
  • search engines other than google
  • hp support 6500a plus
  • hear
  • scrapbook
  • freida pinto zac posen
  • search engines internet
  • search engines rankings 2011
  • connecticut 5 star resorts
  • bea 2011 map
  • tea party manifesto
  • gregg olsen books
  • c span ii
  • bea zuberbühler
  • chicago bears expo 2011
  • virgo
  • overnight
  • search engines watch
  • tea party texas
  • connecticut juvenile training schoolconnecticut kids
  • mtv youtube channel
  • search 5500
  • battleship galactica
  • bengals games
  • chicago bears gifts
  • freida pinto can't act
  • search jail inmates
  • chicago bears jewish players
  • dimension
  • connecticut 97.7connecticut attorney general
  • dis x
  • streets
  • alexandria
  • new england patriots 1997 roster
  • la ink 2011 season 5
  • new england patriots wiki
  • tea party hats
  • bea verdi
  • search 990 finder
  • injections
  • tea party zombies download
  • honeycomb
  • la ink ink
  • la ink corey
  • remus
  • bea 71 series staples
  • bengals for adoption
  • cspan washington correspondents dinner 2011
  • zara phillips youtube 2009
  • hdtv
  • chicago bears 4th phase
  • withdrawal
  • bengals insider
  • rams
  • randy moss combine results
  • connecticut renaissance faire
  • cspan hosts
  • beau coup
  • vince young usc
  • randy moss autograph
  • search engines 9
  • mtv 5 cover
  • zara phillips baby
  • randy moss wonderlic
  • hp support quick test pro
  • disaster
  • bengals merchandise
  • la ink upcoming episodes
  • jumbo
  • connecticut 30 news
  • mtv american idol
  • randy moss wallpaper
  • la ink season 5 premiere
  • vince young to eagles
  • greg olsen football
  • inland
  • pheonix
  • battleship kirishima
  • armstrong
  • vince young redskins
  • beagle
  • new england patriots 3 4
  • punctuation
  • chicago bears training camp
  • connecticut department of labor
  • chad ochocinco and cheryl burke
  • hp support greece
  • bengals 80's
  • mtv 25 lame
  • la ink season 5
  • sling
  • chad ochocinco traded
  • sanford
  • chad ochocinco quits football
  • chicago bears pictures
  • vince young jersey texas
  • c span kozol
  • freida pinto glamour 2011
  • search in vi
  • questionnaire
  • greg olsen boulder
  • battleship vittorio veneto
  • fargo
  • randy moss korey stringer
  • bea test
  • defenders
  • hp support center
  • hp support 530
  • vince young 2008
  • forex
  • bengals record 2010
  • disassembledis boards
  • bengals football
  • chen
  • tea party table settings
  • hp support 6310hp support 7200
  • zara phillips queen elizabeth
  • cspan presidents
  • vince young quiz
  • search cfisd.net
  • zara phillips and the queen
  • buildings
  • dis windsor wi
  • beamerbea france
  • vince young endorsementsvince young foundation
  • battleship ipad
  • zara phillips royal wedding picture
  • la ink season 6
  • mtv live
  • philly
  • zara phillips engagement ring
  • battleship history
  • new england patriots 50
  • vince young yahoo stats
  • hp support monitors
  • search domains
  • greg olsen website
  • millenia
  • bengals 09
  • tea party agenda
  • charity
  • prime
  • cspan facebook
  • playoff
  • search engines 2008
  • battleship texas hours
  • powerful
  • randy moss mix
  • finley
  • new england patriots 80
  • cspan streaming
  • acadamy
  • bengals andy dalton
  • cspan ap government review
  • connecticut 100 club
  • bea binene
  • chad ochocinco 15
  • dis systems
  • dis poem
  • la ink cast
  • towards
  • new england patriots 98.5
  • negative
  • casing
  • chad ochocinco sisterchad ochocinco twitter